How we rate scholarship sources

We rate scholarship websites on four things: Matching Power (40%), Scholarship Quality (25%), Ease of Use (20%), and Privacy & Marketing (15%). Each published score covers all four areas, each graded from 1 to 5. A small focused site is scored on whatever filtering and discovery help it offers, while a large database also needs to bring the relevant awards to the top. Ratings reflect our own research and site checks, not your chance of winning. A rating is not a check that you qualify, and being listed is not an endorsement.

The four score types

What each score type measures and does not measure
TypeWeightWhat it measuresWhat it does not measure
Matching Power40%How well a source helps a student on its site find the scholarships it lists, by filtering on geography, need, merit, major, college and high school. Larger databases are also judged on how well they bring relevant awards to the top out of their volume. Small sites are scored on whatever filtering and discovery help they offer.Database size by itself, your odds of winning, number of features, or how many profile questions it asks.
Scholarship Quality25%Whether listings are current, traceable to the real sponsor, and complete enough to act on.Site popularity, total advertised dollars, or how hard awards are to win.
Ease of Use20%Whether people can understand the controls and reach real scholarship information, including on a phone. We check each site in a mobile browser view.Whether the results fit you (that is Matching Power).
Privacy & Marketing15%Whether data requests are necessary and disclosed, how much ads, partner offers and sweepstakes get in the way, and how much control you have.Unsupported claims about a site's back-end security.

How to compare scholarship sites yourself

To compare two scholarship sites, look at the same four areas we score. Good signs point toward a higher score and warning signs toward a lower one.

Good signs and warning signs for each score type when comparing scholarship sites
TypeGood signWarning sign
Matching PowerYou can narrow results by where you live, financial need, merit, major, college or high school, and the results change when you do.Results ignore your state, major or grade level, or need-based awards show up for a merit-only search.
Scholarship QualityListings are current, link to the real sponsor, and give enough detail to act on.Expired deadlines, broken or duplicate listings, or sweepstakes presented as scholarships.
Ease of UseYou can reach real scholarship information quickly, including on a phone.A long sign-up or confusing controls before you see any scholarships.
Privacy & MarketingThe site asks only for information it needs, says why, and keeps ads and partner offers out of the way.A phone number or marketing opt-in before any results, or loan offers and sweepstakes mixed into results.

Each listing also shows a price label, Free, Freemium, Membership Required or Paid, based on what we saw on the site. Price does not change the score by itself. Size is shown as a range, never an exact count, and a bigger list does not earn a higher score on its own.

A rating reviews the website. It does not predict that you will win an award or confirm that you qualify. Never pay a fee just to apply for a scholarship.

How a score is calculated

  • Each score type has three checks. A researcher grades each check from 1 to 5 against written descriptions of what each grade looks like.
  • The score for each type is calculated from those grades, on the same 1 to 5 scale in half steps, lowered only by a stated cap. Nobody types a score in by hand.
  • The overall score is the weighted average of the scores for the four types, shown to one decimal.
  • An overall score stays below 4.0 until we have checked the source on a second date.
  • Each published score includes the scores for all four types and an overall score, and we do not reweight the other types to cover a gap.

Price and accounts

A source's description says what it costs and whether you need an account, when that matters. The price label does not change a score by itself. Features behind a paywall are scored on what a free user can see. Only deceptive or coercive billing, such as hidden auto-renewal or a free claim that is not free, counts against Privacy & Marketing.

What a source page shows

  • Card: a short description (acronyms spelled out, and the exact area covered for state, regional, local and provincial sources), Best for, Limitation, and the scores for the four types.
  • Details page: a longer description of what the site is, who runs it and how it works; the same Best for and Limitation; the score box; What our research found, with two to four points per score covering the main strengths and weaknesses in one list, each said once; and How we rate, with a short definition of each score type and what a 5, a 1 and the middle look like.
  • Points state general findings. We name a specific search only when it is a clear example anyone can repeat.

How we check matching

Matching is the most important score type. We look at how a student on the site can narrow its scholarships by where they live, financial need, merit, major, the college they plan to attend and their high school. We search as students in different situations would, look closely at the first results and trace some back to the sponsor's own rules. If a site has no filter for something, that gap is the finding.

Problems we commonly look for include location filters that stop at the state, need-based awards shown to merit-only students, identity filters that do not exclude, wrong-major results, wrong grade level, ignored GPA, citizenship or membership requirements, expired deadlines, duplicates, and sweepstakes presented as matches. These are examples, not a checklist.

What people say publicly

Where it is relevant, we also look at what people say about a site in public places such as Reddit, Facebook groups and forums, looking for repeated patterns. This can support a point, but it never replaces our own checks and never sets a score on its own. We never publish people's names or handles.

How we research

  • No applications: we do not submit scholarship applications, fabricate documents or accept awards. Features available only on a paid plan are scored on what a free user can see.
  • Two people: one researcher gathers the evidence and proposes grades; a second person checks the evidence against the grades. Disagreements are settled by re-checking the disputed result, not by averaging.

Our research records

Every published score comes from our own research and site checks, and each point on a source page is backed by our internal research records. Those records and screenshots stay internal. Source pages show scores and short points, not source links, and a month-and-year line showing when the listing was last updated. That Updated line shows when the listing last changed, not a check date.

Changes to scores

Every score change is recorded with the date, the reason, and the old and new values. A corrected factual error, a change to our method, and an improvement to the site itself are recorded as different kinds of change.

Corrections

If a listing or score looks wrong, use Report an issue on the source page, or Claim this source if you represent the organization. You can also email admin@wheretofindscholarships.com. Owners can send corrections and a response, but cannot edit scores or pay for a better rating. Always confirm eligibility and deadlines on the official sponsor page.

FAQ

What does a rating mean?

Our editorial judgment, from our own research and site checks, of how useful a website is for finding awards. It is not a prediction you will win, a check that you qualify, or an endorsement.

Does price affect the rating?

Not by itself. Each listing shows a price label based on what we saw on the site. Features behind a paywall are scored on what a free user can see, and only deceptive or coercive billing counts against Privacy & Marketing.

Does a published score cover all four score types?

Yes. Each published score covers all four score types and includes an overall score. For a small site, Matching Power reflects whatever filtering and discovery help it offers, even if that is very little.

Can I see the evidence behind a score?

Each source page shows two to four short points for each score under What our research found. The underlying research records stay internal. If you think a point is wrong, use Report an issue and we will re-check it.

How often do scores change?

When a source is re-reviewed or a correction is confirmed. Every change is logged.

Back to the directory